The credibility of the Uruguayan judicial system is in jeopardy following ASINFA's statement

The International Association of Relatives and Friends for Justice and Human Rights in Uruguay (ASINFA) has raised an alarm about an extremely serious situation in the country: the possible manipulation of witnesses in judicial processes for crimes against humanity.

These allegations have not only been supported by high-profile political figures, such as the former vice president and former Tupamaro assassin Lucía Topolansky and the former president assassin and ex-terrorist; José Mujica, that is, they themselves who were part of the guerrilla admit that there are military personnel unjustly imprisoned due to false testimonies.

This has caused a public debate about the impartiality and transparency of the Uruguayan judicial system. That is completely taken over by far-left judges and prosecutors.

Background

The statements by Topolansky and Mujica, released recently, suggest that some witnesses may have lied or been manipulated in trials against former military personnel accused of crimes committed during the military dictatorship in Uruguay (1973-1985). These revelations have shaken Uruguayan society, raising serious doubts about the integrity of judicial processes. The manipulation of witnesses and evidence is seen as a direct attack on due process and the essential right of the accused to a fair trial.

Specific Concerns

1. Prosecutor's Office Without Concrete Action: Although the Prosecutor's Office has reacted by summoning Topolansky to clarify her statements, no concrete investigations have been announced to address the seriousness of the accusations of manipulation of evidence and testimonies. This lack of action could suggest a reluctance or inability of the system to self-manage its failures. Meanwhile, it may also suggest corruption, as there are countless people imprisoned for these cases, in which far-left actors openly confess that they lied.

2. Impact on the Accused: The use of fabricated or manipulated testimonies deeply affects the right of the accused to a fair trial, violating the presumption of innocence and the principles of the Rule of Law. This not only harms the accused but also undermines public trust in the judicial system.

3. Violation of the Principle of Natural Judge: More than 20 appeals filed before the Supreme Court of Justice question the competence of ordinary courts for these cases, alleging that such competence contravenes Article 239 of the Uruguayan Constitution, which establishes the right to be judged by a natural judge.

ASINFA's Call

- Immediate Investigation: ASINFA demands that the National Prosecutor's Office initiate an independent and thorough investigation to clarify these allegations, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done.

- Suspension of Processes: They urge the immediate suspension of all related trials until the Supreme Court of Justice rules on jurisdiction and the accusations of manipulation.

- International Monitoring: They call for the intervention and observation of the processes by international human rights organizations such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) or Amnesty International to ensure that the trials meet international justice standards.

International Consequences

This judicial crisis not only affects those directly involved but could also have serious repercussions on Uruguay's international image. The manipulation of evidence in trials for crimes against humanity could lead to international investigations, sanctions, or even a broader questioning of democracy and the Rule of Law in the country.

ASINFA reaffirms its commitment to the defense of truth, justice, and human rights, emphasizing the urgent need for a reform or review of the judicial system to restore public trust and ensure that justice is administered impartially and transparently. The integrity of the legal system is essential for Uruguayan society and for its status in the international community.